Talk:Indian Packing Company

Indian Packing Company has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 28, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Bay Packers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indian Packing Corporation

I'm going to move this article shortly as I've been researching this company. The new name should be Indian Packing Corporation. The corporation was created in 1919 by the consolidation of the New England Supply and Indian Packing (based in Providence) and Green Bay Packing. The company and corporation are often used (incorrectly) interchangeably. Even team histories get this wrong. But this sort of explains why the team became the Green Bay Packers and not the Indian Packers.Americasroof (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brave of you to pick this up, and I'm a bit at a loss why no one has really put any research into this before. It seems simple enough, especially if one has access to an archive with Green Bay-region newspapers. One thing I did want to note is that the Indian Packing Company did exist prior to 1919. This is an announcement that the company agreed to meat inspections by the Bureau of Animal Industry in 1914. The current article implies (intentional or not) that it formed in 1919. A government list of independent slaughterhouses assembled in 1917 also listed Indian Packing in Green Bay. --Ando228 (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Council Meats"

This article mentions "Council Meats", but doesn't say what council meats are, or link to a page that does. I'd recommend either defining the term, or leaving it out. BevansDesign (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:45, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Indian Packing Company/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 23:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:49, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I will start with a source spotcheck. I will check 5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 says what it needs to, same with 5, 7, 9, and 12. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:53, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images are relevant and are both Public Domain. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no edit warring, the article is focused and it doesn't have too much detail. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:57, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is neutral, it only had one issue I found but I fixed it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:00, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, major issues with prose or MOS. Pass. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that because the Green Bay Packers were named after the a canned meat company, PETA called on the the team to change their name?

Source: The Daily Oklahoman

Reviewed: Heartburn

Improved to Good Article status by Gonzo fan2007 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 63 past nominations.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Packers + Delaware? Have to review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good. Nice work. BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]