Talk:Indian Head gold pieces/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: – Plarem ^{(User | talk | contribs)} 19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; the spelling and grammar follow an established system. (American English). The article follows Wikipedia's Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There is a good amount of references, the sources are reliable and this article contains no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   It contains most major aspects and is focused on the subject.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   I can see the page is stable with no edit wars, etc. since its creation on the 19 August, 2011.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All the images are tagged & non-free images have fair use rationales, the pictures are appropriately used and have suitable captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   – Plarem ^{(User | talk | contribs)} 19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

PASSED – I pass this article under the Good Article Criteria – Plarem ^{(User | talk | contribs)} 19:52, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing it.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2011 (UTC)