Talk:Independent expenditure
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added Citation to: "In 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held in Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission[1] that political action committees (PACs) and other groups that made independent expenditures, but not contributions to candidate committees or parties, could accept contributions without restriction as to source or size." SandwichProf (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
vlex.com https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/speechnow-org-v-federal-891441105. Retrieved 26 September 2023. {{cite web}}
: Empty citation (help): Missing or empty |title= (help)
Start a discussion about improving the Independent expenditure page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Independent expenditure" page.
Categories:
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles