Talk:Independent Evaluation Group

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International development Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Why disputed?

Why is this disputed? Look fine to me.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 15:16, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If the independent evaluation group of the World Bank writes about its goals and operations it is objective. They have no axe to grind... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.255.54.131 (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

The Director-General section reads like a resume, and it looks like it was lifted word-for-word from the source. I considered re-writing the whole section as "Alison Evans is the director general of the group." but now I'm wondering if this would put the whole article's notability in question as a copyvio? My gut tells me this could just be redirected to World Bank, but there's a lot of little issues and there's probably a proper way to approach it. Advice? Estheim (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

question as to copyright violation

The information in question was provided by IEG directly, through the bio page listed on IEG's website. IEG has granted permission for the information to be listed here. Please let us know if this is not best practice or needs to be edited further. It was only our intention to provide accurate information. https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/expert/alison-evans — Preceding unsigned comment added by RKM IEG (talk • contribs) 23:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]