The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I recently made an edit to remove the duplicate infobox {{PRIndependence}}, which was included under both "See also" and "External links". Another user reverted my edit and asked me to discuss it here, which I am now doing. As I see it, there is no reason to include the same information twice, and infoboxes are not usually placed in "See also" sections. Is there any reason to keep the duplicate infobox? RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: To clarify, I'm referring to the navigational template at the bottom of the page, not the infobox in the top right. I usually use the term "infobox" informally for both, but my word choice may be why there's some confusion about my edit. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Business is theft, suppressing violent fringies with little popular support is repression, Chomsky is a sage, etc.
I support PR independence myself, but this is crazy. Whole thing needs to be junked, and re-written. But the fact this has been here a while indicates that no one really cares, which is something, I suppose. 31.94.73.86 (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"In the 21st century, a majority of Independentistas seek to achieve independence either through peaceful political means or violent revolutionary actions." Well, that's obvious. Aren't these the only two possible ways to achieve independence? You may want to rephrase that... Steinbach (talk) 09:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
