Talk:Inclusion Melbourne

Inclusion Melbourne is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi all,

Please see equivalent article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Yooralla which the Inclusion Melbourne article is based on. If the Notability/Advert tags are going to be added to this page, they should be added to Yooralla and other pages also.

This article itself is based on third-party external sources (e.g. a book that has recorded the history of Inclusion Melbourne, Breaking Wishbones.) as required by Wikipedia. I can add additional independent third-party sources to the article, citing the original work that Gawith Villa/Inclusion Melbourne has done in personalised supports for people with intellectual disability.

Inclusion Melbourne has received continuous coverage in many newspapers, including Leader Newspapers in Melbourne, Australia, over many years (see here: http://stonnington-leader.whereilive.com.au/search/?q=inclusion+melbourne&x=0&y=0). On this basis, at the very least, Inclusion Melbourne should have a stub entry -- and the entry I have written is a very brief one. Alexincmel (talk) 05:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited both this article and Yooralla for a more WP:Neutral point of view. Scopecreep (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I've added citations to independent, third party sources, so it would be great to take off the reference/citation tag. Alexincmel (talk) 06:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thank you. I've removed the tag. Scopecreep (talk) 08:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]