Talk:In the Bedroom
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Revisions succeeding this version of this article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Fair use rationale for Image:ITB.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:ITB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Image-ITB.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Image-ITB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
This is a great film, but who wrote this comically overblown review/description? Someone a bit too much in love with their own fulsome prose style!
Manslaughter may seem an unfortunate but reasonable prosecutorial option given the evidence, rather than implying a corrupt or incompetent prosecutor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.115.232 (talk) 12:05, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Completely agreed...this review needs to be revisited and revised...I am more than confident that someone used a thesaurus to write this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkfo (talk • contribs) 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Someone needs to fix this page. The plot synopsis is weird, and everything is just everywhere. No viable sections or parts to the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.110.196.43 (talk) 03:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Plot synopsis
[edit]Synopsis seems far too long..? I'm not comfortable cutting it back without some kind of consensus. What are others' thoughts? 2A01:4C8:C0A:12DA:E0C5:2AEA:57D8:1905 (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)