Talk:In Theory
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:In Theory (Star Trek: The Next Generation))
![]() | In Theory has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 6, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from In Theory appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:In Theory (Star Trek: The Next Generation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 18:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
This all looks pretty good, but I have a few points of possible improvement to put forward. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- In the "Plot" section:
- We don't mention that Data is an android; perhaps this is a point worth making? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- There is a reference to "Captain Picard" but he hasn't been properly introduced in the main prose of the article, just the lede. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Why do we give the names of most characters but then refer to "Commander Riker" as opposed to "Will Riker"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- The same can be said for "Chief O'Brian". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- We use "Lt." here but perhaps it would be best to spell out "Lieutenant". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- "sub-routine" then "subroutine". Standardise to one spelling. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- In Production:
- Jonathan Frakes is a duplink. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- In Reception:
- No need to have quotation marks around Jammer's Reviews if it is the name of a website. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- "having Captain Picard pilot" - no need to call him "Captain" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
I would really recommend preserving these links via a web archive, lest they become deadlinks at some point in the future. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Midnightblueowl: Thanks for the review, I think I've addressed everything and added those archiveurls. Miyagawa (talk) 19:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Miyagawa: Another great piece of work. I'm happy to pass this now. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:22, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- GA-Class Episode coverage articles
- Low-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class Star Trek articles
- Low-importance Star Trek articles
- WikiProject Star Trek articles