Talk:Impulse-control disorder

My recent edit of the introduction

In this edit I rewrote the description to try to make the distinction between ICDs listed elsewhere in the DSM-IV-TR, ICDs included under "ICDs not elsewhere classified", and ICDs proposed for inclusion. I have also removed the age of onset data because the paper cited addresses only intermittent explosive disorder, oppositional‐defiant disorder, attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder as ICDs, which typically have an early onset, but excludes pyromania and pathological gambling, which typically have a later onset. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

It looks like Zoono92 has disappeared (last edit August 13, two days after submitting a DYK and a GAN), so I rather doubt the original expander is going to turn up at this point. At the moment, close paraphrasing concerns—unaddressed in 12 days—are jeopardizing the DYK nomination. Is this anything you were planning to work on? I don't know whether you were planning on shepherding the article through the Good Article process, but the paraphrasing issues will affect GAN as well as DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I noticed this at WT:MED and thought I might be able to offer some suggestions. But my cursory glance left me with the impression this needs a lot of work, and I've got other priorities. But I've tried to at least make the introduction understandable, and I've just removed two claims from the introduction that Sandy had tagged. That's about as much as I'll be doing here. The people at DYK should notify WT:MED when they have a health-related candidate. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Too many problems to address quickly, multiple copy edit issues apparent in every section, lack of WP:MEDRS-compliant sources, problems with WP:MEDMOS, not complete enough for GA, a good deal of speculation based on case reports and hypotheses, MOS issues throughout, I did a few corrections and removed some blatant undue speculation. Non-MEDRS-compliant DYKs on medical conditions do not belong on Wikipedia's main page ... please advise the writer to read and understand WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS on the types of sources required for medical articles-- we don't write entire articles around hypotheses, single case reports, and speculation. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello everyone! My sincere apologies for not being able to reply the past month, I actually had no access to the wikipedia page. However, as I've read the comments now, I'll be trying to make corrections from now on! Thank you for your patience :) Zoono92 (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

So I've looked over all the comments and as much as I love the article, I would have to be honest and say that I can not do anything on it at this point. Please do not get me wrong! I really want this article to be great, however my current schedule cannot permit me the time to work on it anymore, if only had I learned about it last week I could have done my best to correct it. So at this point, All I can say is that if you guys want I can take this article down from the DYK and GA nomination. My sincere apologies! Zoono92 (talk) 17:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

I think you might want to take down the GA nomination, because those almost never go well when the primary authors are too busy to answer questions. (Just remove the nomination template from the top of this page, and the bot should fix up the rest for you.) But keep it in mind for the future: you've done some good work here and you can always nominate it again. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding! I deeply appreciate it! I've worked hard to add more information to this article and I would definitely want to make it better as soon as I get some break iA. Thank You Again :) Zoono92 (talk) 01:37, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Outdated

I've done a preliminary pass to clean up some of the (many) issues here, but the article still needs a total rewrite to update for DSM5. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:34, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

excoriation disorder

excoriation disorder, skin picking is not classed F63 in ICD-10 since 2013. see here on the pdd of excoriation. Vatadoshu (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Impulse control disorder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019204551/http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/changes%20from%20dsm-iv-tr%20to%20dsm-5.pdf to http://www.dsm5.org/Documents/changes%20from%20dsm-iv-tr%20to%20dsm-5.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Caused at birth

Could anyone confirm that all of these symptoms could be too brain damage caused from lack of of oxygen to the brain at time of birth 2601:280:CA80:15C0:C841:6B66:4B1D:3013 (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)