Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

SPC Joseph Henry, So What?

Wikipedia is not a soapbox for SPC Henry's thoughts on the IOTV. This article should definitely be policed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 20:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above was from me, was not logged in at the time. And to further clarify, my comment and removal of SPC Henry's personal thoughts in the body of the article does not necesarily mean I disagree. It's only that Wikipedia is not meant for some random E-4 to make a statement. Jersey John (talk) 20:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Past dated future talk

'The US Army is looking into supplementing the heavy IOTV with a new lightweight Modular Body Armor Vest (MBAV), which already in service in Ranger and Airborne units. The MBAV does provide less protection, but is more suitable for patrol in Afghanistan than the IOTV. The first units should begin receiving body armor on May 11, 2009.[5]' ==== The date speaks of the past as if it is future "should begin -- 2009" Should this not be updated with the current usage statistics and otherwise? I'm not equipped to modify the current as I've no knowledge on the subject, but this nonetheless seems odd for an article to do 24.42.194.134 (talk) 01:33, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Improved Outer Tactical Vest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_mps_indv_hard_armor.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:04, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]