This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
I've been sent an email that this entry might be deleted because it is consider by whoever sent the message to be a dictionary entry and not an encyclopedia entry. In fact, the issue of Implicit Divestiture is the most critical judicial issue facing the Native American tribes of the United States at this time, because it puts the question of indigenous sovereignty outside its traditional protections in the United States Constitution and the 19th century Supreme Court decisions called the Marshall Trilogy, and within the power of the current Supreme Court. This effects, I believe, in the long run, the territories of the United States as well. And in future, I believe it will be in conflict with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Quod Erat Demonstrandum. Taulapapa (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]