Talk:Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team

COVID-19 Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Pulmonology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Pulmonology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Viruses Low‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team (8 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	7,136	7,136
Reports	11,658	11,658
Estimates	16	3,770
11 European countries estimates on 28 March 2020	2,068	2,068
World estimates for 3 strategies	1,686	1,686
See also	118	118
References	30	30
External links	603	603
Total	23,315	23,315

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Premiership of Boris Johnson#First and second COVID-19 waves|Jonhson government]] The anchor (#First and second COVID-19 waves) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Criticism of code

Code Review of Ferguson’s Model. Some people are anonymously criticising the released code for the model used in predictions. Is it worthy of including in the article (probably from anther source)? --Error (talk) 13:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis?

It's weird to have a page for the "response team" and none for the centre when the faculty are essentially nearly identical to the faculty of the centre. I think this should be moved to a page about the centre itself and then specific stuff about the centre's covid response in a subsection. Does anyone object to that? Cheers. Mvolz (talk) 14:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This seems sensible enough to me, having an article about a response team seems a little odd, however, it's having major impact, so not surprising Shadowssettle_(talk) 15:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Attomir and Yug: I feel you might have a problem with this Shadowssettle_(talk) 15:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problems with it. – attomir (talk | contribs) 16:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The center should be also covered but I created this Response Team article in the urgency of early covid crisis and the Response Team "high" news coverage. Current content is fully centered upon this Response Team. If someone is ready to write a more generalist page about the center, it is very much welcome. Yug (talk) 12:19, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I created a stub here: MRC_Centre_for_Global_Infectious_Disease_Analysis but having done so I'm wondering if there's really enough content to do both as organisations; maybe this article should be specifically about the reports, instead of the team itself, to provide more separation? Mvolz (talk) 02:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]