Jump to content

Talk:Imperator luteocupreus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperator luteocupreus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk19:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imperator luteocupreus
Imperator luteocupreus

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 11:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

New enough, long enough and within policy. There is one reference (12) which isn't well formatted, and presented just as a [1] in the reference list, it would be nice if this could be fixed before the article goes onto the main page. Image is fine, QPQ done. The hook is fine and supported by an inline citation leading to a readable and reliable-looking source. Should be good to go! Yakikaki (talk) 18:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]