Talk:Images and Words

Albums C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Take the Time

Who does the background vocals in Take the Time? The part in the choruses where you can hear "It's time to take the time" in the background, specifically.

Sounds like Labrie to me. --Rp81 20:50, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, nobody is listed in the liner notes as "backing vocals", so I would have to assume as well that it was Labrie. 65.100.179.145 21:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take the time length

Does anybody know something about a longer "Take the Time" (about 18 minutes)???

Err, on the Images Tour they would perform a 12-13 minute version of the song, with the intro to The Mirror at the start and a jam at the end of the song. The performance can be found on Images and Words: Live in Tokyo. --Mintyhead 05:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a longer 15+ minute verson they played at a concert, but its only a bootleg recording and is very bad quality —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.156.240 (talk) 21:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biasness

This article is very seem bias and is more of a bio than fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Liquidblue8388 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Extra pages?

Do we really needs the extra pages for "Take the Time" and "Under a Glass Moon" when all it says is the track number and appearances? Seems like a bit of waste without any kind of trivia or song info.

Leave 'em there. I will fill out a little information on the lyric themes. InnocuousFox 15:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Learning to Live - sep page please

Would someone who knows how better than me put together a new page for "Learning to Live". I need to put in some info about the song and the theme but don't want to butcher the standard formatting. Thx. InnocuousFox 15:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instrumental Info

The article states that this album was the first until Octavarium that did not include an Instrumental song. This is false. Six Degrees of Inner Trubulence does not have an instrumental song either. Should be fixed.06:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Technically it's the first until Octavarium that doesn't have an instrumental track - because Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence is track broken, Overture could be considered a separate instrumental song. It's somewhat unclear whether Six Degrees is meant to be 8 songs forming a suite or just one massive song, particularly given that it was released on Score as a single 40-min track. I'm tempted to say the latter, as it would mean Six Degrees (album) has six songs on it, which seems appropriate. Raelthelamb 08:10, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this or whatnot, or even if this is the correct way of going about it, but here goes. Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence does not have an instrumental track. It has an instrumental section. Yes on the album it is listed as a track, however if one was to take it as it is on the album then they would be disagreeing with Octavarium's main concept; Everything ends where it begins. This can be seen starting with Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence, and ending with Black Clouds & Silver Linings. On Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence "Overture" is part of the end track, which is track 6. So Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence has 6 tracks. Train of Thought has 7 tracks. No disputes there. Octavarium, 8. Seeing the pattern? Now, you'll be quick to point out that Systematic Chaos has 8 tracks also, however, track 1 and 8 are two parts of a single track, "In the Presence of Enemies", and I quote "The song was split into two parts for the album, due to its being a good open and close to the album. According to Portnoy, the band felt it was too long to open the album, but did not want to close the album with a long song, as they had with the twenty-four-minute title track of their last album.[18] The song is normally played in its entirety in live shows.[19]" taken from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Systematic_Chaos". So we can say Systematic Chaos has 7 tracks. And the final piece of the puzzle, Black Clouds & Silver Linings, with 6 tracks. This completes The concept of Octavarium. I hope this settles it. Thank you. Octane13b (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Magnum Opus

Rather than finding a citation for that statement (which seems extremely difficult - wouldn't it have to be a huge poll of DT fans?), I'm for removing it alltogether. Largely because from my experience the majority of fans would say Scenes from a Memory, and also because DT are one of those bands where every album is somebody's favourite. Raelthelamb 08:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree 100% Docta247 08:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Very subjective. Kill it. InnocuousFox 15:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance we can also kill the "considered a seminal release" statement? I *love* I&W, but that kind of unsourced and POV statement sticks in my throat :-\ Docta247 16:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Producer

Is David Prater, the producer of this album, the same person as the David Prater the article links to?

obviously not, as that prater died some 4 years before the album was released. I'll just remove the link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.46.30 (talk) 02:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dream Theater - Images and Words.jpg

Image:Dream Theater - Images and Words.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC) so what were saying is that most stoks go down —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.186.90 (talk) 01:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool consider this a landmark release in the genre?

i've never heard tool discuss dream theater in any way, shape of form

can we get a citation for that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theradu123 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Another Day (Dream Theater song)

"Another Day" is not an individually notable single. As such, Another Day (Dream Theater song) should be merged into this article. Neelix (talk) 02:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images and Words: Platinum in Japan?

One of the first things leadsinger James LaBrie said under the concert in Japan, just right before they played "Caught in a Web", is: "We have a new album out called Awake, and thanks to you peaople, who made us platinum. Thank you very much, Japan!" link Chrislemur (talk) 20:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia?

Is the fact that Kansas City Royals played Metropolis before their game really noteworthy? Seems a little too... well, trivial. I think it should be removed, or the trivia section expanded. nlapierre 02:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nlapierre (talk • contribs)

Power Metal

Really?

Credits

I restored the official credits for "Take the Time", as the "correction" was credited to Portnoy's Twitter account. No way in hell is Mike Portnoy a reliable source for anything related to James LaBrie. —Gendralman (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Images and Words. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080301025502/http://www.dreamtheater.net/archive_dreamtheater.php?y=2007 to http://dreamtheater.net/news_dreamtheater.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]