Talk:Illinoian (stage)

Geology Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Illinoian (stage) is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glaciers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glaciers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Glaciers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlaciersWikipedia:WikiProject GlaciersTemplate:WikiProject GlaciersGlacier articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Laurentide ice sheet

There is some confusion about the Laurentide ice sheet. This article says that it occurred during the Illinoian, but the article on the Laurentide ice sheet says that it occurred later, after 100,000 years ago. Dudley Miles 19:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

The Laurentide ice sheet has formed during glacial epochs and disappeared during interglacial epochs multiple times during the Pleistocene.Paul H. (talk) 19:07, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies and thanks for the clarification. I see I did not read it carefully enough and it says it last occurred after 100,000 years ago. Perhaps as you obviously know more about the subject you could amend the article to make clearer the periods it covered.

The Pleistocene ice ages seem much the weakest area of science on Wikipedia I have come across. Riss glaciation redirects to Wolstonian Stage, and Heinrich event describes the Younger Dryas as a possible H0, but does not mention the Older Dryas and Oldest Dryas, even though H1 seems to be at the same time as the Oldest Dryas. I find the Dryas articles confusing as they switch between calibrated and uncalibrated dates, sometimes without making clear which is being used. Hopefully some day someone more expert than me will sort all this out. Dudley Miles 21:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Removed "Co2 glacial cycles 800k" Graph

The "Co2 glacial cycles 800k" graph was removed from this article because it uses stratigraphic terminology that is quite antiquated, obsolete, and completely meaningless. This is discussed in the talk section for that figure. Before it can be used, this graph needs to be revised to remove the discredited terminology and have it replaced with the correct terminology. Paul H. (talk) 15:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Illinoian (stage). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]