Talk:Ikun-Shamash

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Ancient Near East

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mari, Syria#Kings of Mari|King of Mari]] The anchor (#Kings of Mari) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

//According to François Thureau-Dangin, the king reigned at a time earlier than Ur-Nanshe's of Lagash.[1]// I traced the source, and the source referred to another source which seems to be quite outdated. The synchronism does not appear to be correct due to the fact that control of s. Mesopotamia is attributed to this king and at the time of Urnanshe the largest political units fighting among themselves were local city states. If the synchronism is correct a direct source to tablet or tablets giving the evidence needs to be cited, and it also need to be specified just how contemporary the archaeological source is.

You can have an outdated source if you ascribe the info to its scholar. Plus, being old does not equal outdated. So, has been synchronism been refuted by newer data? Is there a source yo support this that actually mention the synchronism and refuse it?.--Attar-Aram syria (talk) 19:38, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]