Talk:Ijima's leaf warbler
Appearance
A fact from Ijima's leaf warbler appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Ijima's leaf warbler is named after Japanese zoologist Ijima Isao (pictured)? Source: Original description states "Dr I. Ijima", the offline source confirming the identification
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Italian Renaissance sculpture
- Comment: I shall be expanding the Ijima Isao article in the next few days
5x expanded by Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk). Self-nominated at 14:04, 5 June 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - This isn't related to the naming of the bird after Isao Ijima, but I am getting some source weirdness when trying to access citation 5, "Identification for Ringers 2: The Genus Phylloscopus." Specifically, I'm getting a security error. I dunno if that's just something on my end, but I figure I should bring it up.--Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 15:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, the url in question is to a Pennsylvania State University document repository; I'm not getting any error myself (but do sometimes with other sites, depending on what device I use to access them); the link could always be removed, while retaining the source itself? Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Odd! I found it here, and it checks out. Feel free to use whatever works best.--Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 16:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, the url in question is to a Pennsylvania State University document repository; I'm not getting any error myself (but do sometimes with other sites, depending on what device I use to access them); the link could always be removed, while retaining the source itself? Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Neutral: - Again, not pertaining to the naming of the bird after Isao Ijima, but the casual (albeit quoted) use of "race" as a synonym of subspecies seems, on first glance, a bit strange. I can't access source 15 and 5 (see above considering the latter), but I'm curious if "subspecies" could be swapped without changing the meaning, or if "race" is/was the appropriate term to use, given the date this animal was identified.--Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 15:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- As you say, this is a quote "Ticehurst (1938: 162) regarded this as a race of Ph. coronatus, and it has also been made a race of Ph. occipitalis"; I've just found there's an article here Race (biology) and have changed the link to this instead; it's pretty common in my experience to find the term used as an equivalent to subspecies, at least in slightly less recent literature, so it seems helpful to retain this so that readers not otherwise familiar with the usage become more so; thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- That link helps!--Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 16:24, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- As you say, this is a quote "Ticehurst (1938: 162) regarded this as a race of Ph. coronatus, and it has also been made a race of Ph. occipitalis"; I've just found there's an article here Race (biology) and have changed the link to this instead; it's pretty common in my experience to find the term used as an equivalent to subspecies, at least in slightly less recent literature, so it seems helpful to retain this so that readers not otherwise familiar with the usage become more so; thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Gen. Quon[Talk](I'm studying Wikipedia!) 15:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)