Jump to content

Talk:Ijaz-ul-Haq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ijaz-ul-Haq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:04, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination of his father?

[edit]

The lead states Ijaz-ul-Haq entered politics “following the assassination of his father”. This wording was introduced by an ip in 2009, replacing the word “death”. Our articles on General Zia, Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, and on his death, Death and state funeral of Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, aren’t quite so definitive as to it being an assassination. I think this properly reflects the balance of sources. Would “death” be more appropriate than assassination? KJP1 (talk) 18:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]