Talk:Idiot defense
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Idiot defense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Pedro Guerrero
[edit]Are you sure Pedro Guerrero belongs here? Usually, the term refers to someone who plainly should have known better (and often probably did). Twin Bird 21:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, the Pedro Guerrero case refers to him being functionally ignorant of facts, but this term refers to those who are suspected of faking ignorance and by all rights should know better. I'm going to remove the reference, feel free to revert if you find otherwise. Gh0st3000 05:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gh0st3000 (talk • contribs)