Talk:Ida Rolf
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ida Rolf article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Australian DOH citation outdated
[edit]As of data collection in 28 July 2014 (pg 1), “There is a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of rolfing and therefore no reliable conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of rolfing for any clinical condition" (pg 10).
Baggoley C (2015). "Review of the Australian Government Rebate on Natural Therapies for Private Health Insurance" (PDF). Australian Government – Department of Health. pp. 16, 19, 125–8. Lay summary – Gavura, S. Australian review finds no benefit to 17 natural therapies. Science-Based Medicine. (19 November 2015). Cyintherye (talk) 03:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Alternative medicine articles
- C-Class Women scientists articles
- Low-importance Women scientists articles
- WikiProject Women scientists articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Women writers articles
- Low-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles