Talk:I the South
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Party name/Article title
[edit]The party name should be translated as I the South (as the wiki article was originally named), as used in the source the Political Handbok of the World 2013.--Autospark (talk) 15:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Autospark: You're right, probably the correct translation is "I the South", the page should be moved --Maremmano (talk) 21:07, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I move the page --Maremmano (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- My impression is that Lansford took inspiration from en.Wikipedia (in 2013 this article was named "I the South"). Isn't "I South" a more literal and correct translation than "I the South"? Same thing for "We South" instead of "We the South". --Checco (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- That could be the case, more likely than not. I the South and We the South are grammatically correct English, however. I'd prefer those names for that reason, personally speaking.--Autospark (talk) 17:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Uhm, which names do you prefer? I like "I South" and "We South" better. --Checco (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- I the South and We the South because of the definitive article, so they sound and 'feel' right. Personally. Unless there's a nuance in the original Italian language names that I am not aware of.--Autospark (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- In Italian "I the South" would be translated into "Io il Sud" and "We the South" into "Noi il Sud". Quite different meanings. That is why I prefer the most literal translations ("I South" or "Me South" and "We South" or "Us South"). --Checco (talk) 09:24, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- I the South and We the South because of the definitive article, so they sound and 'feel' right. Personally. Unless there's a nuance in the original Italian language names that I am not aware of.--Autospark (talk) 14:10, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
- Uhm, which names do you prefer? I like "I South" and "We South" better. --Checco (talk) 07:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
- That could be the case, more likely than not. I the South and We the South are grammatically correct English, however. I'd prefer those names for that reason, personally speaking.--Autospark (talk) 17:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- My impression is that Lansford took inspiration from en.Wikipedia (in 2013 this article was named "I the South"). Isn't "I South" a more literal and correct translation than "I the South"? Same thing for "We South" instead of "We the South". --Checco (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I move the page --Maremmano (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I the South. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720041711/http://www.ilsud.eu/2011/07/15/nasce-la-d/2685 to http://www.ilsud.eu/2011/07/15/nasce-la-d/2685
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I the South. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206070817/http://www.senato.it/composizione/21600/159070/152847/genpagspalla.htm to http://www.senato.it/composizione/21600/159070/152847/genpagspalla.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)