Talk:I Look to You/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Resolved comments from TbhotchTalk C. 02:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC) |
---|
*1st review
Dead links10 dead links (including false positive).
Infobox
Lead
Background
Music
Release and promotion
Singles
Commercial success
External links
|
Final comments
[edit]Several problems that I notice, need a hard work, so I put the article on hold on until June 28, 2010. (UTC) TbhotchTalk C. 18:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Thank you for this very informative review. I've gone through (and i think i've addressed the issues). Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- I'll tick () what was done, I'll cross () what still wrong. TbhotchTalk C. 18:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Many things were done, several more were ignored also new changes generated some typos throughout. I extended the revision time until June 27. TbhotchTalk C. 19:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry i wasnt aware of the latter issues, just been through and copyeditted the article. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well, all(most) comments were resolved, I'll check it again in case I forgot something. TbhotchTalk C. 22:16, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry i wasnt aware of the latter issues, just been through and copyeditted the article. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Further comments
[edit]- Lead
- WP:ALT -> Personally, "Whitney Houston" written in the alternative caption text, is too specific, maybe "an afro-american woman" or "a woman with wavy hair" or something like that, of course I won't fail the article for this comment. TbhotchTalk C. 02:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- then August 31, 2009 -> typo
...based on an aggregate score of 70/100 from... I noticed that this is not on the "Critical Reception" section.- beating her previous career best first-week sale of 205,000 units with Just Whitney (2002). -> beating her previous career best first-week sale of 205,000 units with Just Whitney (2002) in the chart.
- Background
In February 2009, Houston made her official public comeback at Davis's "Pre-Grammy Gala", her first major live appearance since 2004 -> Source does not says thatRef 2 has a typo: (E!Online)- rousing -> WP:Peacock?
- Ref 1 and 6 need consistency.
- Music
R. Kelly contributed two songs -> Did you mean R. Kelly contributed writing two songs- In the song Houston -> In the song, Houston
- Reference 10 has a typo (Latest activity 2 days ago).
- Also released in UK and US -> Consistency needed
Houston hosted a listening party with Clive Davis in New York -> Davis was already mentioned.and Vivica A. Fox[12] as well as many representatives from the American press -> Source?- September 14 and 15 and featured -> September 14 and 15, and featured
On October 18, Houston performed "Million Dollar Bill" live on -> Since "Million Dollar Bill" was used in the last line, perhaps -> On October 18, Houston performed the same song live onIreland, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Germany,[23] Switzerland,[24] Austria,[25] Belgium,[26] Italy[24] and Australia.[27] -> Germany,[23] Italy, Switzerland,[24] Austria,[25] Belgium,[26] and Australia.[27] and do not need Wikilinks and remove unsorced countries.
- Singles
"Million Dollar Bill" which was written and produced by Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz was -> "Million Dollar Bill", which was written and produced by Alicia Keys and Swizz Beatz, wasgiving Houston her 13th number-one dance single -> Source- was originally lined up to be the lead single, but was succeeded by the album's title song. -> I'm confused, didn't was "Million Dollar Bill" which was released as the first official lead single, morover, where is the source?
- Furthermore, following its performance on The Oprah Winfrey Show, the song charted at number 66 on the U.S. Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. -> source?
on the UK X Factor which resulted in the song charting at number 38 and 44 on Irish Singles Chart and UK Singles Chart respectively.[32] It also charted on the Japan Hot 100 at number 16.[33] -> why it is italicized?"Nothin' But Love" was set to be released as the album's third single to coincide with the tour but was only released to UK radio stations. --> [citation needed]
- Commercial Success
- week sales of 51,632 -> full stop missed
- Chart procession and succession
- the template {{Expand section|Danish, Polish and German Navigational boxes|date=February 2010}} must dissapear.
- References
- 36,
46 (dead link), 97, 98, 99, 103, 108 need fixes. - one dab link
I've re-reviewed the article, those are new problems. TbhotchTalk C. 02:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have done half of these. Aim to do the rest tomorrow and day after. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 15:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
I am failing the article, I'd gave it a final date (28 June), and it is today. If you feel this is in error, you may request a Good article reassessment or a re-nomination. TbhotchTalk C. 19:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Why is there a time limit on this process? If Lil-unique1 finishes this up 4 hours from now, why can't it be a GA? Does the "G" spoil if it's not put back in the refrigerator right away?
- And anyway, it's still the 28th as I write this, an hour after you rang the terminal buzzer, so the deadline you picked (from where?) hasn't even passed yet. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- As I said before If you feel this is in error, you may request a Good article reassessment or a re-nomination. I'd been waiting 3 weeks and Lil is busy with another article. TbhotchTalk C. 22:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sheesh! Sorry if i cant be on wikipedia as much as I'd like to. I didn't realise GA's were specifically time-restrained. It takes time to search for appropriate sources and to fix deadlinks. But nevermind... i'll work on it in my leisure and nominate when I feel that I've done all I can that way I don't have to feel pressured to work towards a deadline. Lil-unique1 (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)