Talk:I Got You (Leona Lewis song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I Got You (Leona Lewis song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I Got You (Leona Lewis song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 16, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Leona Lewis (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leona Lewis, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Leona LewisWikipedia:WikiProject Leona LewisTemplate:WikiProject Leona LewisLeona Lewis

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Comment

The song's title is "I Got You" AngelCrying (talk) 14:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever wrote she performed I Got You on Jimmy Kimmel was very misinformed. First of all, the source given that never mentions performing that and numerous sources that show she ONLY performed Happy and Outta My Head and never performed I Got You. I removed it since it was incorrect and her performance on Jimmy Kimmel had nothing to do with I Got You at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.238.106.52 (talk) 19:48, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

top 15

Someone keeps on changing it to her second top 20 single from Echo, when it is in fact her second top 15 single from Echo. Leona has never peaked below 14 in the UK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.168.19 (talk) 05:48, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I never heard about a "TOP 15" singles chart, It's more proper Top 10 or Top 20. Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 05:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For further information, Lewis peaked the UK Singles Chart 2 times. Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 06:02, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Top 15 is never referred to, only Top 10, Top 20, Top 30, Top 40, Top 75, Top 5, Top 3... anemoneprojectors talk 12:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But look at Justin Bieber's article (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Justin_Bieber) where the phrase "Top 15 hits" is used. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.42.168.19 (talk) 20:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is Leona Lewis, not Justin Bieber. Just because it's in one article doesn't mean it should be in another. Maybe the US and Canada use Top 15 but the UK does not. anemoneprojectors talk 00:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little FYI, she has peaked in the charts 3 times —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.205.34.33 (talk) 19:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make sense, but it's nothing to do with this article. anemoneprojectors talk 22:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you

The song "I See You" was released as single? Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 03:52, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it wasn't. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Release history

This song was withdrawn from release in the US, therefore shouldn't we remove it from the table? Wikispan (talk)

Maybe, but also could be write a comment about, something like "Cancelled by J records" or simply "Cancelled". Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 02:28, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still yet to see a reliable source confirming it was withdrawn. Do you have one? anemoneprojectors talk 02:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't, I will try to search for one. Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 03:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. But it now seems clear reading personal correspondence, both from US Radio stations and Sony Music themselves, that IGY was pulled. It also helps to explain the lack of US reviews. Wikispan (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't. but I found "‘I Got You’ will be released digitally in the UK on 21st February, followed its release on CD the following day, that’s 22nd February" only, and it's already on the article. Can be put <!-— --> instead delete it? Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 03:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it not strange that IGY has not appeared on ANY of the 50+ U.S. charts? i'm beginning to doubt whether it was actually released in america. there has been no mention of it on US radio and very little promotion. Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to the information I saw, it was pulled back to allow Leona to promote the Avatar soundtrack. Unfortunately we don't have a reference that makes this point clear. Wikispan (talk) 00:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I heard the same thing, but have no reference for it. anemoneprojectors talk 01:54, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should we changed UK digital download date to 19 February because this is what both Amazon and iTunes show? Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If source say that, of course Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 16:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russia

The chart page if translated where the highest figure 210 sits it says:

Наивысшая позиция в чарте → Airplay Detection TopHit 100 - 210

Now i've heard of a bubbling under hot 100, but a bubbling under top 200? and that to of an airplay chart? i'm not sure its wise to have this in the article. Lil-unique1 (talk) 05:48, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's strange, but that's why I added "feel free in removing it if its not proper". Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... yeah i think we're still abit dubious about Russia. i dont think its been added to Goodcharts yet. Its methidology is odd too. The disclaimer at the bottom says "Data for the last past week, are in this column, from Monday to Tuesday change every hour, in accordance with information received from radio stations. At midnight from Tuesday to Wednesday the position of the track on a weekly chart TopHit 100 fixed and then remains unchanged." Lil-unique1 (talk) 05:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That have an asterisk for Esters" and "Airplay". Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. "Esters" meaning?Lil-unique1 (talk) 06:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 16:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Footprints in the Sand (song)

According to the article "IGY" is her lowest charting single in the region (UK), but the song Footprints peaked at number 25. But I don't know if "Footprints" was released as single (w/o double A-side "Better in Time/Footprints in the Sand). Thanks Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 19:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Footprints" as a single was a double-A side with "Better in Time". Its charting at 25 on its own was due to digital downloads from the album so "IGY" is still Lewis's lowest-charting single in the UK. Anemone Projectors 19:50, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Musicnotes

this is the link. On Wikipedia "Musicnotes.com" may be used but without the link. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 16:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why without the link? Anemone Projectors 19:14, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerally, I don't know, perhaps because is a download site, but it is used in FA songs (Speechless (Michael Jackson song), 4 Minutes (Madonna song), Say Say Say, Irreplaceable, and others) Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 19:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's used several times in A Girl like Me (Rihanna album) with direct links so it's not blacklisted. This doesn't make sense to me. If there's a direct link, why not use it? Is there a guideline that mentions it or is it just FA reviewers saying the remove the links? Anemone Projectors 20:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe the second, because MN.com is used also with the direct link in GAs songs. Also the sheet book can be used as reference. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 20:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the book might be better. MN.com doesn't seem to be anything. Anemone Projectors 22:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you meant MusicNotes. I got confused :) Anemone Projectors 22:38, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, only one thing ISBN of Leona Lewis Echo is missing, I cannot find it. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 22:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forget this i get it, it is 9781849383967 Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 22:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I've been doing some work on this article today, because I want to nominate for GA. But I was wondering because there isn't loads of critical reviews for the song and apparently none for the music video (I've conducted a lot of searches) and that the song charted poorly so the Chart Performance isn't that full, would that affect it being able to ever qualify for GA? I hope someone replies to this! calvin999 (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't affect it so long as you kept the commentary intact as much as possible. Thus comments like it became Lewis' xyz top-twenty charting single make up for the lack of detailed information. However note that sometimes it is possible for articles like this to fail because they are not all-encompassing. Rose Colored Glasses (Kelly Rowland song), Grown Woman and Forever and a Day (Kelly Rowland song) are all examples of where the information is scarce but GA can still be achieved. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks calvin999 (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Got You (Leona Lewis song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:35, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Lead

Although some critics criticised the song for not being memorable. → Replace "Altough" with "Despite this,"
Done Aaron • ^{You Da One}
...and number 14 on the UK Singles Chart... → Remove "and"
Done Aaron • ^{You Da One}

Background

Not sure if separate subsections are necessary in this instance. Make it two separate paragraphs and rename the section "Background and release"
Made into sections. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 23:45, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

No issues

Critical reception

No issues

Chart performance

Did it really fail to achieve commercial success? It charted in numerous countries.
It charted on several charts, poorly. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 23:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

No issues

Live performances

No issues

Credits and personnel

No issues

Charts

No issues

Release history

No issues

References

No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:14, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done everything. Thanks. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 23:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 00:25, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Aaron • ^{You Da One} 00:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on I Got You (Leona Lewis song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I Got You (Leona Lewis song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120317130222/http://www.leonalewismusic.co.uk/gb/news/detail/leona_on_alan_titchmarsh_this_week/ to http://www.leonalewismusic.co.uk/gb/news/detail/leona_on_alan_titchmarsh_this_week/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]