Talk:I Didn't Know About You

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Jazz

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Songs

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Notability

Below is an exerpt of the notability guidelines for songs:

A song is probably notable if it meets one or more of the following standards:

It has been covered in sufficient independent works.
It has been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups.
It has been ranked on a national or significant music chart.
It has been recognized by journalists, biographers, and/or other respected cultural critics as being significant to a noteworthy group's repertoire.
It has won a significant award or honor.

Could you indicate which point(s) it satisfies. Presently, the article does not assert the notability of the song, but that can be fixed, if you provide the rationale. Martijn Hoekstra 13:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It satisfies the first and second points. Gareth E Kegg 13:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see from your last edit on the article page that it indeed statifies the point for being preformed independantly. As for the coverage in independent sources, you could improve the article by adding some of those sources, and incorporating what they have to say into the article. Martijn Hoekstra 14:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]