Jump to content

Talk:I Can Transform Ya/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 22:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Issues
I am beginning the review :) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 22:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It also peaked in the top twenty of the United States, at twenty-one in Australia and Ireland. It also charted in the top thirty in the United Kingdom, becoming a top ten hit on the UK R&B Chart." You have two back to back sentences with the same opening line, please rephrase one or the other.  Done
  • "The song was set to be the first real record that Brown had released since his altercation with then-girlfriend Rihanna at the beginning of the year." Needs to have a source right after, or it falls under original research.  Done
  • "The song, influenced by hip-hop and rock, has been described as "upbeat tune",[...] Grammer, should be described as an  Done
  • aCharts is used throughout the article, needs to be replaced.  Done, with the exception of Australia which I explained.
  • A fair amount of dab links, please see here  Done

Alright, simple issues, please work to correct them ASAP. Other than that great work on the article. (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 22:34, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Regarding the Critical reception section, could you expand it? Each review is only like 1 sentence.
Ehhh, lol. As for the critical reception, I've scoured single and album reviews for the few weeks I went back and worth working the article and that is as much as I could find. Also, Billboard really didn't cover the song so it was hard to develop any interesting facts or anything to inject the chart performance with. Candyo32 (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reading it again the only real outstanding issue i found was synth-pop being included in the genres section because its not mentioned in the article (maybe it is but i didnt locate it, inform me if im wrong) (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 05:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)  Done[reply]

References
Ref Issues :
  • ref [1] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics)  Done
  • ref [2] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics) (De Link)  Done
  • ref [3] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics) (De Link)  Done
  • ref [6] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics) (De Link)  Done
  • ref [5] → work=Los Angeles Times publisher=Tribune Company  Done
  • ref [12] → work=About.com publsiher=he New York Times Company (No Italics)  Done
  • ref [23] → remove italics  Done
  • ref [24] → remove italics  Done
  • ref [25] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics) (De Link)  Done
  • ref [26] → work=MTV News publisher=MTV Networks (Viacom) (No Italics) (De Link)  Done

Part 2:

  • ref [5] → Your missing a closing ref or something, not formatted correctly  Done
  • ref [11] → work=New York Times publsiher=NY Holdings  Done
  • ref [13] → Remove italics  Done
Prose
:GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    (CK)Lakeshadetalk2me 09:33, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]