Talk:I Am the Walrus (American Dad!)

I Am the Walrus (American Dad!) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 9, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Am the Walrus (American Dad!)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew RD 13:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I shall be reviewing the article sometime later. -- Matthew RD 13:21, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for taking a while, but I will start the review now. This is how the article fares against the GA criteria;

Well written: Mostly fine, see notes below
Factually accurate and verifiable: Fails at present, see notes below
Broadness in coverage: Passed
Neutral: Passed
Stable: Passed
Images: The one image is fine, right tags used, Passed

Comments

Nine of the references are from the Internet Movie Database. I'm sorry, but in my experience, the IMDb is user-generated, hence not a reliable source. I recommend changing the sources to something more reliable.
- Also replaced the IMDb references with a ref to the episode itself, which contains opening and closing credits. 89119e (talk) 21:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And YouTube, how is this reliable?
- I chipped in and removed the YouTube sentence and its associated link. 89119e (talk) 20:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the recption section, I don't like the format of the reviews; all three started with "Reviewer-X from X-site gave the episode a positive review." Try to use a little more variety, like "Reviewer-X from X-site reacted positively.
- Addressed. 89119e (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will place the article on hold for seven days. Good luck. -- Matthew RD 14:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing the comments. I will now pass the article. Well done. Let's hope there would be more American Dad! articles to reach GA. -- Matthew RD 00:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "dancing" scene with the ottoman

I believe this is a reference to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUa6pcMOLEM

It made the rounds on the internet a few years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.185.238 (talk) 12:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff sees Roger?

While at the dinner table, Jeff walks in eating a popsicle and Roger is at the table without a disguise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.17.35.35 (talk) 20:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]