Talk:ISO 15919

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on ISO 15919. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:31, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISO 15919. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grouping of dissimilar sounds

In the overview table it is shown that ज़ of devanagari and ౙ of telugu have same transliteration character i.e. z. However ज़is a voiced alveolar fricative while ౙ is a voiced alveolar affricate. Different soumds. I couldn't check the authencity since the ISO paper is under a paywall. Is this really the case in ISO paper ? Inquisitive creature (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Inquisitive creature I guess that this issue is solved already, isn't it? G.G.Hirve (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“Not in the standard”

@Getsnoopy Hello – the standard is not accessible to me as it has a paywall. What does it actually say about the Urdu orthography characters? I added ࣇ for ḷ because this character was creates specifically to represent the same sound as ਲ਼ in Punjabi. If the standard says ḷ = ਲ਼ then I would think this follows. عُثمان (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It only lists those that wouldn't be native to Devanagari or the other Indic scripts, such as z, etc., but it doesn't say anything about the Perso-Arabic script as it's being used for Punjabi ("Shahmukhi"), which is why I removed it. Getsnoopy (talk) 20:45, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]