Talk:iPad (4th generation)

IPad (4th generation) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 9, 2013	Peer review	Reviewed
January 29, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
March 13, 2013	Peer review	Not reviewed

Current status: Good article

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as High-importance).

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was procedural close. --BDD (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

IPad with Retina display, → IPad (4th generation) – The article should not have been moved to a marketing term, with a stray comma in the name, no less. The original name "iPad (4th generation)" was perfectly fine and encyclopedic and follows the same naming standard as the other iPad articles. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 13:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - No one calls it that. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 14:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Name wasn't discussed or agreed upon prior to move. 68DANNY2 (talk) 14:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Moved without having a discussion and a consensus. Mover should have payed more attention and double checked instead of just pasting "iPad with Retina display," from the first sentence. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 14:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now that we're in the odd situation of the "current" title not existing and the article moved back, a procedural close is in order. --BDD (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the page to the original title of iPad (4th generation) with a redirect from iPad with retina display (because it seems to be a plausible search term.) I did the restoration because the copying of the text and redirection of the article created a copyright violation -- i.e., the editing history had not been moved along with the text as is required by our terms of use. So the article is now restored to the first version prior to its being moved to the marketing term. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:04, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:IPad (4th generation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 08:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After careful inspection of the article I have found it to be compliant with all criteria of a good article. For this reasons I have passed the nomination. Retrolord (talk) 08:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The new iPad - problematic redirects

Hallo, I know precious little about iPads but have found a strange situation:

New iPad redirects to IPad (4th generation) (though until Oct 2012 it redirected to 3rd gen)
The New iPad, The new iPad, and New ipad redirect to IPad (3rd generation) (and an editor recently tried a cut-and-move to move the article to the first of those)

This can't be right. Either

Only one machine is known as "the new ipad" and all the redirects should go there, or
Both these, and perhaps earlier and future models too, are or have been known as "the new ipad":

If one machine is the primary usage but others are sometimes called this, then the redirects should go there and there should be a hatnote leading either to the other machines or to a dab page.
If there is no primary usage, we need a dab page, with all the redirects pointing to it.

I leave it to those who know about iPads to sort it out - please! PamD 11:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All articles/redirects with the title "New iPad" should be directed to the 3rd generation iPad article as it was marketed with that name. Although some people may refer to the most recent generation iPad as the "New iPad", Apple official markets it as the "iPad with Retina display." Despite this, people may refer to the former from time to time, though it is not a common name for this generation from what I've seen so any articles with the aforementioned title really shouldn't be redirected this article. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 16:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPad (1st generation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPod Touch (fifth generation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This ipad is obsolete

According to the official Apple website, this ipad has been discontinued. Please fix this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.22.174 (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPad (3rd generation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IPad (4th generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IPad (4th generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030135119/http://www.efi-news.com/2011/09/ipad-drastic-and-far-reaching-change-in.html to http://www.efi-news.com/2011/09/ipad-drastic-and-far-reaching-change-in.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]