Talk:iPad (10th generation)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Authors cited reception is unfounded
[edit]In the "Reception", an author from CNN is cited and he criticizes that the screen is "starting to show its age" because it is "pixelated" compared to the iPad Pro mentioned in the sentence before. However, the iPad 10 has practically the same resolution and pixel density as the iPad Pro, and exactly the same resolution and pixel density as the more expensive iPad Air. https://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=11941&idPhone2=11940&idPhone3=11411 So while the people on wikipedia did nothing wrong by citing the author, the statement of the author himself is wrong. So what would be the best way to handle this?
- note that the author wrote something wrong?
- remove the entire source because the author does obviously not know what he is talking about?
Please provide your input, thank you. Punkt64 (talk) 14:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)