Talk:IO.SYS
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If this is not used by XP, then why do I have a (blank) file at C:\IO.SYS? Can I delete it? 61.68.108.125 10:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. I think the only reason Microsoft creates an empty IO.SYS (also MSDOS.SYS) in XP (and other versions of Windows that don't run on top of DOS) is for backwards compatibility with old DOS or Windows 3.x applications (or installers?) that expect those files to be on the boot drive for some reason. --ozzmosis 16:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Actually now that I think about this a bit more, even that explanation doesn't make a lot of sense, because IBM PC DOS used IBMBIO.COM and IBMDOS.COM, instead of IO.SYS and MSDOS.SYS... --ozzmosis 17:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Disc layout requirements
"The files IO.SYS + MSDOS.SYS must be continuous" - surely this should be "contiguous" as documented in the reference. Simon Marchese (talk) 08:13, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- Automatically assessed Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Microsoft Windows articles
- High-importance Microsoft Windows articles
- WikiProject Microsoft Windows articles