Talk:INS Kursura (S20)
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the INS Kursura (S20) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
INS Kursura (S20) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 4, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from INS Kursura (S20) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggestions
[edit]G’day, good work so far on improving this article. I have a couple of suggestions while you wait for a GA review: AustralianRupert (talk) 23:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- There appears to be a discrepancy between the infobox and the article regarding the vessel’s decommissioning. For instance, the infobox says “27 September 2001”, but the article says “decommissioned on 27 February 2001”. If you could fix this discrepancy, I believe that the article would meet the B-class coverage/accuracy requirements; Done
- currently there is a bit of information in the infobox that does not appear in the body of the article, and doesn’t appear to be cited with a reference. For instance: the builder information; the 20,000 nmi surfaced or 380 nmi submerged range. If you could add this to the article's body with a reference, I believe that the article would meet the B-class referencing requirements; Done
- try to avoid repetition. For instance, “As many as 1,500 people visit it everyday during the peak days” and then this “Daily visitors usually range between 500 and 600 and shoot up to 1,500 during the tourist season”. I’d suggest merging those two sentences. Done
- the ASW abbreviation should probably be spelled out fully on first mention for lay readers. Done Good luck with the review and thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 23:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- All done, thanks a lot for the quick look. Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 05:46, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class Andhra Pradesh articles
- Low-importance Andhra Pradesh articles
- GA-Class Andhra Pradesh articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Andhra Pradesh articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles
- Low-importance Indian history articles
- GA-Class Indian history articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles