Talk:INS Jyoti (A58)

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Issues

Some sources say the complement is 92(16 officers + 76 enlisted) while some others 208. What to do? I think 208 is fine considering the size of the ship. Thanks, TheStrike Σagle 07:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe they are like maximum and minimum crew. So both can be included. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 11:15, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But the official navy site says 92!....I think 208 could be wartime...not sure of that..I'm placing 92 for now.... How about like this?

Complement: 92(16 officers)
208(23 officers) (wartime)

TheStrike Σagle 11:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we then should go by the navy's number. Cz that would be more reliable, and "wartime" would be OR, unless it is mentioned somewhere and I have missed it. Anir1uph | talk | contrib 16:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on INS Jyoti (A58). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

From top to bottom- INS Ranjit (D-53), INS Jyoti (A-58) and INS Mysore (D-60) during TROPEX 2014. Feb 1, 2014.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]