This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
It looks like that one is just a cut-n-paste fork of this. Might was well combine the term with the standard that defines it, if nothing else notable can be said about it in two years. W Nowicki (talk) 23:14, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mildly oppose merger. As I understand it, the TEDS is just one portion of IEEE 1451 (which also defines communication protocols, etc.) In a full-fledged coverage of this area, the TEDS probably warrants its own article. In the meantime, both articles are small, so they could be merged and then split again when the article gets more complete.
Main advantage I see of keeping TEDS separate at the moment is that there are probably other descriptions similar to TEDS. Linking articles on those things together would be helpful (I don't have specific articles in mind here, but I am sure there are competing standards). Having separate article makes making those connections easier than if TEDS is a subsection of IEEE 1451. Zodon (talk) 05:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
