Jump to content

Talk:IEC 61508

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jargon seems ok to me it is accrurate and correct terminology.

Are we sure the demand mode classification is correct? I'm reading a spec sheet for a stop button classifying low demand sil 2 as 10-6 to 10-7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.38.70.140 (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TERMS

[edit]

What does E/E/PES mean? provide link or define. Garykempen (talk) 20:20, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the first line "electrical/electronic/programmable electronic".--InstEng (talk) 11:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Avionics

[edit]

What about RTCA/DO-178? DO-178B — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.46.198.232 (talk) 19:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Histoty of this ISO standard ?

[edit]

From where is this standard born ? A bit of history ?

--AXRL (talk) 16:34, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to write. Here is one source:
  • Bell, Ron (2010-11-29). "Introduction and Revision of IEC 61508". Advances in Systems Safety. London: Springer London. doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-133-2_16. ISBN 978-0-85729-132-5.
Dimawik (talk) 07:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories of likelihood of occurrence

[edit]

I doubt if the description of the occurrence matches the displayed frequencies. "Occasional: Once in system lifetime: 10^−4 to 10^−5" How is one in ten thousand per year equal to once in a system life time? I'd say a system lifetime is in the order of magnitude of 20 years. Once in its lifetime would thus give a frequency of 1/20 per year -> 10^-1 to 10^-2 193.67.17.36 (talk) 13:20, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]