Jump to content

Talk:IDempiere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NEXT GENERATION or FORK of ADempiere

[edit]

There are basicaly 2 point of view for the beginning of iDempiere, so the article said claire in the History tab:

"iDempiere can be seen as the next generation of ADempiere or as a fork of the ADempiere Branch GlobalQSS Adempiere361."

In August 2017 two new users delete one point of view with edit summary coments like

"In my opinion, IDempiere is a fork of ADempiere, Is not the next generation"

Assuming good faith (AGF) in their edits, I open this thread, to discuss the dispute and avoid the war of reversals according to wikipedia policies., IMarch.co (talk) 04:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view in the expression can be seen as ... or ..., Palmpilot (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:IDempiere/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 07:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This looks very far from ready for a GA nomination to me.

As such I think it meets the "It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria" condition for immediate failure. (Unfortunately, the state of GA reviewing is such that "immediate" means "over two months after you nominated it"...sorry about that.)

I did also run a copyright violation check through Earwig. It found a big overlap with http://www.sts.vn/2016/06/02/idempiere-2/ but I think the copying probably went in the other direction. So I think there isn't a problem there but it probably is worth checking into this more carefully if this is to be brought forward for GA again.

David Eppstein (talk) 07:34, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Palmpilot: You are welcome to use this review as a checklist of things to improve about the article, but please note that the review is nearly two months old and is closed. When you are done with your improvements, if you wish to do so, you are going to need to make a fresh nomination. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein: Yes David I understand and thank you for your help, I regret not having seen the notifications at the time of the review, if I have any questions about your comments I hope you can help me.Palmpilot (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]