Talk:IBM RS/6000

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Not a valid abbriviation

I worked for IBM in the early '90's when these were coming out. I distinctly remember that the abbreviation "RS/6000" was verboten, to the point that email was censored and would kick back with an error if it was used. This was a royal pain because sometimes it would be embedded in a quote from a customer's incoming email.

I don't have any official source to cite, so I thought I'd note it here as interesting trivia. Maybe someone will be able to flesh that out along with more details about development.

I recall (I think) that the graphics card platform was called "Rios" as this was the internal code name and it stuck, informally.

Networking was Token Ring.

It shipped with multiple SCSI cards (even though one could control many things — throughput of the controller?) with HD's up to half a gigabyte, CD-ROM, and huge tape cartridges, and a 3½" floppy.

Długosz (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess IBM changed their mind at some point; perhaps they originally insisted on "RISC System/6000". The original ones may have used Token Ring, but I suspect that didn't last long, given that they were competing with established companies such as Sun, who sold machines with Ethernet.

"RIOS" was the multi-chip POWER CPU implementation; see IBM POWER Guy Harris (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please rename as IBM RS/6000

Consistent with other IBM articles.50.136.247.190 (talk) 04:01, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.cbronline.com/news/ibms_bonuspak_for_os390_provides_set_of_internet_tools_full_protection_from_the_year_2000
Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.cbronline.com/news/ibm_aix_launch_more_waffle_than_hard_facts
Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.cbronline.com/news/ibm_joins_workstation_price_war_with_4000_rs6000_m20
Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.cbronline.com/news/ibm_ready_to_ship_tadpoles_powerpc_book
Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.cbronline.com/news/rs6000_offers_32_bit_kickers_nc_support_no_re_branding
Triggered by \bcbronline\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted links have been removed.Blethering Scot 14:22, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which is practically vandalism given that they were RS [1]. I'll open a RS/N discussion. Someone not using his real name (talk) 14:34, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 19:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on RS/6000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 March 2021

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. BD2412 T 00:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IBM RISC System/6000 → IBM RS/6000 – Per WP:COMMONTITLE, the most commonly used name should be used. I've Googled both names and the new name seems to be used around 6 times as much. On the Google Ngram viewer, RS/6000 is also far more popular, see here PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:IBM RISC System/6000#Please rename as IBM RS/6000 requests the same rename.

On the other hand, this edit says "99Electrons moved page RS/6000 to IBM RISC System/6000: Consistency with other articles about IBM computers, as suggested on the talk page", but I don't see anything on the this page that suggested such a move. I guess the "consistency" is because most other articles about IBM computers with "System/" in the name spell out "System" and precede it with "IBM"; the one exception was AS/400, although that was renamed to "IBM System i" when the product was renamed. That exception was probably because of WP:COMMONTITLE. Guy Harris (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:COMMONNAME. —В²C ☎ 14:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Minicomputer?

When I worked on it, it was termed a minicomputer (as opposed to a mainframe). Is the RS/6000 indeed a minicomputer? The article doesn't mention this. Thanks.

Lehasa (talk) 16:29, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If it sits on your desk and has a display whose frame buffer is part of the RS/6000, it's a workstation.

If it sits in a machine room and responds to requests from other computers on a network, it's a server.

Otherwise, it might be considered a superminicomputer (as it's 32-bit or 64-bit) or a midrange computer. Guy Harris (talk) 19:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]