Talk:I'm Into You

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the I'm Into You article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Jennifer Lopez Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jennifer Lopez, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jennifer Lopez on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jennifer LopezWikipedia:WikiProject Jennifer LopezTemplate:WikiProject Jennifer LopezJennifer Lopez articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Requested move 1

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. This request is somewhat moot now that this is a redirect to the album, but in any case "into", being a preposition shorter than 5 letters, should be lower case. See WP:CAPS. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 08:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Into You (song) → I'm Into You — Would like to move this page to I'm Into You, but I couldn't do it because there is a redirect. Can an admin delete the redirect and move this page? Thank you! Greets, Daniel 749 15:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removed from mainstream radio

According to this update, "I'm Into You" has been removed from the April 26 section. Ozurbanmusic (talk) 00:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. But still on at Rhythmic tho HERE. Edited accordingly. Thanks for the update.—Iknow23 (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:51, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Into You → I'm into You – Per WP:CAPS any preposition shorter than 5 letters, should be lower case. "Into" is one of them. ℥^nding·start 19:51, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think its fine the way it is as the name is grammatically incorrect anyway is if it were it would be "I'm in to You." So I think it's meant to be "I'm Into You." Candy o32 01:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Composition titles, it'd be "I'm In to You" as the first word of a compound preposition should be capitalized. As such, I'm tempted to say "I'm Into You" is fine since "Into" acts like a compound preposition ("In to"). Powers ^T 12:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Powers. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Powers. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 17:11, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Powers. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 17:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page not moved per discussion below. Personally, I don't buy the compound preposition argument, but I can't go against a near-consensus to ignore the rule I would usually apply. - GTBacchus^(talk) 19:57, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Into You → I'm into You –

caps —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but again, I would recommend against using the uncontroversial route for a request like this. –CWenger (^ • @) 00:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above discussion ("into" is a compound preposition) and MOS:FOLLOW. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. "into" is a preposition, and most people who use it do not bother with its etymology. The time when people claimed that "into" should be 2 words "in to", "passed in the time of my longfathers of old". (When I was younger a few pedants claimed that "onto" is not a valid word, but that objection has stopped.) Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MoS regulations should not be used when sources are contradictory. I have not seen any reliable sources calling the song "I'm into You". Adabow (talk · contribs) 20:27, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"into" is a preposition before its noun and with less than 5 letters, and so should be lowercased. That seems plain. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is a silly use of the MoS. MOS:FOLLOW - otherwise we would still have Right thru Me and Girls Fall like Dominoes. It is not up to us to decide how titles are capitalised, however if there are contradictory sources we should look to the MoS. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, per MOS:CAPS 'Into' is a compound preposition and thus should remain capitalised as this is a published work and lists it so. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:07, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I mean, come on, this is the longest and arguably most important word out of the three that go to make up this title. Whyever should it be this one that gets decapitalized? If we are going to apply our rules (and in the case of capitalization, I agree with Adabow that we should only consider our own rules when sources differ), we should do so with a certain amount of intelligence.--Kotniski (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orphaned references in I'm Into You

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of I'm Into You's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AUS":

From I Made It (Cash Money Heroes): "Australia Singles Top 50". Australian Recording Industry Association. (acharts.us). April 5, 2010. Retrieved 2010-04-04.
From Forever (Drake song): "ARIA Top 100 Singles – Week Commencing 4th January 2009" (PDF). Australian Recording Industry Association. Pandora Archive. January 4, 2009. Retrieved 2010-01-06.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:25, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110117224451/http://rt100.ro/ to http://rt100.ro/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on I'm Into You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]