Talk:Hypericum iwatelittorale

Hypericum iwatelittorale has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 26, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Hypericaceae: Plants Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Hypericaceae, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the plant family Hypericaceae and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.HypericaceaeWikipedia:WikiProject HypericaceaeTemplate:WikiProject HypericaceaeHypericaceae articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:08, November 16, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

GA Review

Passed. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 22:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hypericum iwatelittorale/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Eewilson (talk · contribs) 20:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Description:
- I removed a small redundancy.
- YThey are a paler color on the undersides and have a papery texture. "They" is an unclear pronoun.
- YThe length of stem between leaves is usually longer than the leaves themselves. Make it make sense.
- There are dense, pale, point-shaped glands on the surface of the leaves... Pale? Is a color mentioned here?

Double checked, it does say "laminar glands pale..."

Just a beginning of notes from my phone. More later. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 04:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eewilson, looking forward to the full review. Fritzmann (message me) 18:54, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find any other issues. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 22:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.