Talk:Hyles lineata
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I will be editing this page thoroughly for Behavioral Ecology fall 2107. KmarcusBC (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): KmarcusBC.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hummingbird Moth ID please?
[edit]Is this guy a Hyles lineata ? Photos from Los Alamos, NM.
Two great photos, imo. By Larry Lamsa of LA, NM. TIA, --Pete Tillman (talk) 01:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- ID confirmed by an AZ entomologist friend, by email. --Pete Tillman (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hyles lineata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090819045608/http://www.centerforplantconservation.org:80/ASP/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=2549 to http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/ASP/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=2549
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Food Sources update
[edit]I'm pretty sure I've got these in my yard eating Boerhavia, as attested at http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zeeb/butterflies/Sphynx.html
Add to food sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:7380:4BE0:284C:6FB2:BD17:A890 (talk) 01:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hello! I am reviewing this page for a WashU Biology course. This article for the most part had good organization and great sectioning. I reorganized a few paragraphs in terms of relevant information, and I shifted some sentences from one section to another. I also added more details on the food source of adult butterflies, which differs depending on whether they’re diurnal or nocturnal. Then I added information in the “interactions with humans” section, in which they were used as a food source by Native Americans. I then added the appropriate references to the new information that I added. Awesome job! Z.kelley —Preceding undated comment added 19:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
I thought the article had great organization through many specific subsections. I thought the lead paragraph didn’t fully grab my attention, so I added a little bit about their social larvae behavior to make it stand out more. I like the listing of food resources, I thought that was original and unique from the other Wikipedia pages I have seen. I thought the detailed section on tongue length was interesting and an example of the moth’s individuality. Maybe add a citation under Parental care, but I didn’t change it because I thought it came from the same citation as Oviposition. I got rid of the heading Caterpillar sociality because I thought it was repetitive to place underneath the heading Social behavior. I also made some minor grammatical changes to improve the flow of the article. Thanks and awesome job! engelde —Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Edit suggestions
[edit]I made some minor changes to correct italicization and capitalization of names. I would recommend adding more information to some of the short sections and adding links throughout! Mnoronha456 (talk) 03:14, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
I think this is an overall well-done article about an interesting organism! I would suggest adding some more internal Wikipedia links to relevant pages. If there is any information available about this moth's mating habits or interactions with other species, such as cooperation, parasitism, etc. then those would also be useful additions to the page. Lauraem7 (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Conservation status
[edit]What's the conservation status of this species? How do I get the conservation status of a species? --User123o987name (talk) 00:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)