Talk:Hwasong-13

Korea Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Assembly buildings

http://38north.org/2014/02/jlewis020314/

RSed enough about where the TELs were assembled to add? Hcobb (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to Hwasong-13

In order to be consistent to naming conventions, I proposed to move this article to "Hwasong-13" instead of KN-08. KN-08 is a Western designation applied to the missile, while Hwasong appears to be a local designation and applied to Hwasong-5/6. LionFlyer 04:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Missile canisters

The latest parade on April 15, 2017 shows a version of the launcher where the missile is placed in a TOPOL-M type missile canister. Screenshots from a video here. Soon we will likely learn of yet another name for the missile. What ever the name, I think we should keep all these versions in one article. No missile has actually been tested. They all seem to be different developmental stages of a single weapons system. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 08:04, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arms Control Wonk Podcast

The The James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies and others contribute to armscontrolwonk.com. What is important is the apogee and the figures were released by the Norks and are in this podcast along with a lot of fine detail e.g. they have already tested a re-entry vehicle on the ground. Important to note that burning up isn't the biggest reason for failure, it's tumbling after re-entry. They note that there is reputed to be a device that allows the ground crew to choose to destroy the warhead or to simply leave it to explode at the intended height i.e. terror weapon.

http://armscontrolwonk.libsyn.com/the-hwasong-12-finally — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.74.135 (talk) 06:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Rodong-1 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]