Talk:Hurricane Sandra (2015)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: KN2731 (talk · contribs) 09:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, this is my first GA review.
Criteria
[edit]Article looks decent, only some minor issues listed below.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Inline citations all done properly. Lots of sources supporting the "Records" section.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Compact and detailed, but doesn't overload the reader with information.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No biased views here, just facts.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All satellite images are in the public domain and shouldn't cause any copyright issues.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just some minor stuff below.
- Pass/Fail:
Other issues
[edit]Lede
- Link tropical depression in second sentence?
- "evacuated some residents" – 180 residents is more than 15% of Boca Camichin's population, which is just under 1100 (source).
Meteorological history
- "dissipated into a trough" – is "degenerated" more appropriate?
These should be easy to fix, after which I'll be more than ready to pass the article. ~ KN2731 {talk} 09:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Specified 180 residents in the lede rather than percentages. I went with "some" since 180 people is quite minor for a hurricane evacuation but using percentages can be misleading. Also used changed "dissipated" to "opened up" instead of "degenerated" simply to avoid repetition. Thanks for the review, KN2731! ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 14:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)