Talk:Hurricane Otto (2010)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: intelati^talk 04:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

This should be cool. I'll work on it late UTC today.--intelati^talk 04:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   please fix the diblinks to Grand Turk and Quadrant

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Nice variety of sources. Fix ref number 48 that link is a 404 error.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Easy to understand and clear

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are PD, No problem there

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Fix the disambig links, and I'll pass it.

Fixed. However, ref 48 isn't a dead link for me... Hylian Auree (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Ref 27 actually. --intelati^talk 22:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I see, I've fixed that now. :) Hylian Auree (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.Hylian Auree (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)