Talk:Hunyadi family/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 15:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well-written
a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
- The article is wonderfully written. I found a few sentence or grammar mistakes which I corrected myself as I read the article.
- Verifiable with no original research
a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
c. It contains no original research
- The article mostly uses book or journal sources which are referenced with Harvard templates. All the sources contain the necessary information.
- Broad in its coverage
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
- The article is very broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.
- Neutral
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
- The article is neutral and does not included personal opinions or statements.
- Stable
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
- The article is stable and its content does not change significantly from day to day (edits made in the face of the GA-nomination will be ignored). Neither is there any edit wars or content disputes.
- Illustrated
a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
- The article is nicely illustrated with eight images all of which contain the necessary information.
- Pass, fail or hold?
- With the article meeting the GA-criteria I'm of course going to pass it. Nice job people. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 16:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)