Talk:Hunger (Hamsun novel)

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by 19th century task force.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have written a completely new entry about the novel, since the previous article was an alledged copyvio. ASav

I have reinstated the Blut und Boden reference in regard to Markens Grøde (which was removed by an anonymous contributor). This is one of the most controversial and hotly debated issues in Hamsun's life and work, and it ought to be mentioned. ASav 20:42, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ambivalence about Oslo

The article says 'he ambivalently describes Kristiania as "this wondrous city that no one leaves before it has made its marks upon him."'

The supposed ambivalence presumably derives from the use of the positive adjective "wondrous", but that's not what the Norwegian/Danish text actually says. The original says "denne forunderlige by". It's possible to translate "forunderlige" with "wondrous", but only in a very literal way. "Forunderlig" does mean something that makes you wonder, but the sense is strictly "strange", "unusual", or "remarkable." In other words, it's not a positive adjective, but much more neutral.

Which means there isn't actually any ambivalence.--LarsMarius (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HungerHamsunNovel.jpg

Image:HungerHamsunNovel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Fin de siècle'

I've removed this for several reasons:

a) the phrase commonly alludes only to francophone literature, and is therefore misleading in the context of Norwegian literature

b) it's not a commonly used or understood phrase: wikipedia should encourage elucidative language

c) the phrase is French, and this is the English wikipedia

d) random intrusions of French into an otherwise wholly English article sounds utterly pretentious

BodvarBjarki (talk) 15:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Growth of the Soil

I see that this has been contested earlier, but I have removed the sentence about Mysteries and Growth of the Soil, including the claim that Growth of the Soil "earned" Hamsun a reputation as a proto-nazi Blut und Boden author. The sentence was dubious as it stood, it did not concern Hunger, and the article by Atle Kittang that was used as reference does not say anything of the sort, nor does it even mention Growth of the Soil. I have also made some other small changes, among other things deleted from the plot summary a few unreferenced and dubious guesses about the main character's motivation. Wtfsvi (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]