Talk:Human digestive system

Anatomy: Systems High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to systems.

citate "Black in the 19th century suggested an association of histamine with this secretion." Who is the Black? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.34.225.42 (talk) 10:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ms2410.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article is superfluous. Please redirect to Human Gastrointestinal Tract.

This article is a mess. It also is exactly the same topic covered by the more well-referenced and higher-profile article here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Human_gastrointestinal_tract I don't know if any of the stuff on this article is even worth trying to merge, either. Reading it gave me a headache. At least the parts about about traditional chinese medicine with no references, stated as medical facts randomly interspersed through out this article gave me a good laugh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.84.86 (talk) 09:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

Thanks for creating this article, Iztwoz. Its absence was quite noted on our other pages. Thoughts (in point form!)

Firstly, thanks for putting so much work into creating this article!
I like your writing style, which I feel is quite understandable and not too technical
You can go to [1] or get images from the relevant pages. The page is a little bare at the moment
You may have already started, but it would be useful to start wikilinking any relevant articles to this page so that readers know it exists
Have started a thread on WP:ANATOMY regarding our organisation of GI tract-related articles
If you have access to a textbook of medical anatomy or physiology, or can borrow one, please think of the future generations of editors that may want to edit this page and include some citations :D!
Have requested speedy deletion of Human digestive system, currently a redirect. When that page is deleted, please move this article there. (our article title are pretty consistent in terms of Human x)
Ping to Lesion who has an interest, particularly in oral anatomy and may want to have a look

Hope this is helpful! Article is looking good, and will have another look on Monday to see if I can contribute anything. --LT910001 (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Accessory digestive gland

A logical merge and good use of 'human digestive system' to differentiate from 'human gastrointestinal tract' LT910001 (talk) 23:40, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree with this merge. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Proposed split from Human#Digestion

I've proposed a split between the section on human digestion in Human#Digestion and this article because:

These articles are natural complements. Digestion provides an excellent overview of the digestive process, and Human digestive system provides a good overview of the organs of digestion
The article on Digestion is currently very long, and now there is quite a lot of duplication between these two articles. One way to resolve this, and help readers, would be to centralise anatomical details here, and shorten the section on human digestion in Digestion
This would improve the quality by centralising relevant information, and if performed carefully wouldn't result in the loss of any information.
Overall, I hope that this split would improve the reading experience and quality of information available to readers

Kind regards, --LT910001 (talk) 23:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done

Image at top

This 17th century image was at the top of this article, and I moved it to a thumb that clearly states that it is a historical image, since it is very inaccurate and therefore inappropriate as a first impression for readers. Instead, File:Blausen_0316_DigestiveSystem.png is used in the introduction, since it is the only image that shows the complete digestive system and at the same time being specific in not showing other organs. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The current solution is also acceptable. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Link to "parent"

Shouldn't there be somewhere in the article a link to the "parent"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.58.229 (talk) 09:34, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Digestive system

Voice concern 2409:4042:4D97:C4B5:0:0:288:E614 (talk) 15:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Digestive system

Biology 2409:4043:612:4C20:0:0:2811:78AC (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collect information about human digestive health and write different digestive health issues

... 2409:4070:4781:23FB:0:0:126B:C8AC (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why this article has links from non-human species?

The article “human Digestive system” has links towards articles about non-human species. I’m confused. I think this article should be split into “digestive system” and “human digestive system”. 75.137.1.247 (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a hatnote which directs readers to Digestion for the system in other animals. If material is common the links are OK.?--Iztwoz (talk) 09:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bowel Movement

Should this article mention about bowel movement being the end of the digestive system? Cwater1 (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

6666 102.91.71.107 (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC) I. want walki talk[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 14:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]