Jump to content

Talk:Hugh John Casey/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:08, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A wide ranging, well referenced article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status, as it is compliant with WP:WIAGA and it is informative and well written. I note that several of the published sources were written by "Hugh J Casey"; and that it might be argued that almost 50% of the citations are based on WP:Primary sources. In different circumstances, I might suggest that this article could have potential as a WP:FAC, but I'm making no recommendations here. Pyrotec (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]