Talk:Hudson, Wisconsin

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Vandalism

Seriously, whomever keeps entering random characters or cute greetings in random locations needs to stop.meccaneer 04:34, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Local Color

All the lists of facts, dates, and statistics in this article are quite informative. But there are little or no descriptions about what it's like to live in Hudson. The article on Northfield, Minnesota is a great example of providing local color; the way the sights, sounds, and even the smells (Malt-O-Meal)are described give of rich picture of life in that community. However, there is nothing like that in this article. I've visited the city of Hudson many times, and I have a general (though not completely accurate) view of the town. I could try to provide some local color in this article; however, I probably would not be able to give as accurate description as would someone who has lived in Hudson all their life. One question though: if some statements (exempla gratia "Much of First Street runs along the beautiful St. Croix riverfront.") are ascertained through personal observation, how am I supposed to cite references to comply with Wikipedia's policy on references?-RalphRedFox 21:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't supposed to add unverifiable information to Wikipedia at all. See WP:V for more details. That sort of information would be great in a personal essay about the town, but not in an encyclopedia. Feel free to leave a comment on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers. --Gimme danger 12:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hudson, Wisconsin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]