Talk:Huddersfield Broad Canal

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Huddersfield Broad Canal is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Huddersfield Broad Canal map.

How broad is it?

Shouldn't the article say how wide the locks are, as a comparison with the 7-foot standard used elsewhere? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Width now in infobox. Bob1960evens (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

Suitably referenced, with inline citations
Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
Defined structure, with adequate lead
Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images
Appropriately understandable

I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class. It could probably do with the reference for the rebuilding of Wakefield Road bridge, but otherwise satisfies these criteria, so I am rating it B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 17:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Huddersfield Broad Canal/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates

Keith D 00:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done Bob1960evens (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:52, 5 June 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 18:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)