Talk:Howard le Peton
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clearly
[edit]If that's clearly established well, ok. Wow. I played cricket once, that makes me notable? Again, just wow. --IvoShandor (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- The subject of the article played first-class cricket. Please see WP:CRIN. Andrew nixon (talk) 09:10, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- I guess I'll just never understand why athletes don't have to meet the general notability guideline. Whatever, doesn't matter I s'pose, maybe it'll change one day. Useless article is still useless. --IvoShandor (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think playing for the national team of one's country is generally considered an automatic achievement of notability. He most likely played more of the game to be chosen in the first place, but there are no records of it (at least not in the article). This is much the same thing as every participant to the Olympics being generally held notable, even if little to nothing is known about them. Circeus (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I guess I'll just never understand why athletes don't have to meet the general notability guideline. Whatever, doesn't matter I s'pose, maybe it'll change one day. Useless article is still useless. --IvoShandor (talk) 09:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- Stub-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles