This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
There is currently a notice that it reads like an advertisement. I am not sure if it is or not, but at the least I concur that the article seems strange. It instantly jumps to Starbucks from the get go, but I think this should be at a LATER point; first introduce the person briefly. Don't open with such a huge jump-to, in particular right at 2008. The structure seems sooooo weird ... why is 2008 such an important part of this wikipedia article? Who wrote it? How did it look before that? My recommendation is to make the intro much shorter; and if relevant parts are to be retained, then put them into subparts that are, ideally, as objective and neutral as possible. Mentioning facts is ok, but they should be arranged as if someone NEUTRAL wrote them. Right now this article is simply weird ... I am not even sure if it is an advertisement, but the structure of it is very unusual. It would be best if wikipedia could have a general format for all people, e. g. not make the intro too long for one part. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, agreed. This looks like S's PR folks have written most of the text. Most political scientists and commentators would agree that S has the charisma of a white bread loaf paired with the political judgement of a five-days-old venti latte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.18.241.119 (talk) 11:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
